Re: Intent to NMU mozilla and ITP mozilla-cvs
If libnspr4 has the same release timing that the rest of mozilla (and here
is perhaps my mistake) I can't understand why split the source and why give
an independant version numbre for it.
Christophe
On Fri, 08 Jun 2001 06:08:27 Stephen Zander wrote:
> >>>>> "kitame" == Takuo KITAME <kitame@northeye.org> writes:
> kitame> Hello. I've just done build new mozilla package. It's
> kitame> separated into multi binary package. But still not split
> kitame> libnspr4 from mozilla source. (Is it needed?)
>
> It would certainly save me from maintaining it seperately. freewrl (a
> package of mine) currently uses a local version of it.
>
> --
> Stephen
>
> "If I claimed I was emporer just cause some moistened bint lobbed a
> scimitar at me they'd put me away"
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
> listmaster@lists.debian.org
>
--
Christophe Barbé
Software Engineer - christophe.barbe@lineo.fr
Lineo France - Lineo High Availability Group
42-46, rue Médéric - 92110 Clichy - France
phone (33).1.41.40.02.12 - fax (33).1.41.40.02.01
http://www.lineo.com
Reply to: