Re: Bug#88588: libpam-modules: pam-limits.so is broken
On Tue, Mar 06, 2001 at 02:05:48PM -0700, John Galt wrote:
>
> Sucking up to Branden? Or are you sucking up to Thomas Bushnell?
I'm not sucking up to anyone, and if I were to choose someone it wouldn't be
either of those two.
> Regardless of why you posted, you asked some questions, I guess I should
> answer. What I am WRT Debian is a long time user (~1996) who has gotten
> sick of the idea that the DD is more important than the package. The fact
> that you seem to think that the circumstances around what I say is more
> important than what I say is a perfect example of this. As far as
> credibility: I've stated this off list and on so often that it really
> should be a FAQ. Write me off at your own peril: sometimes I say things
> that are relevant. Often I'm the only one saying the relevant things
> precisely because I'm abrasive: others would say it, but don't because
> they don't want to hurt any feelings. My advice: hang around, you may
> learn something...(but take a valium first if you're susceptible to high
> blood pressure :)
I usually don't have a problem with the things you say but I believe you took
this particular attack a little too far.
It's been my experience that people who use pseudonyms generally feel less
accountable for their actions, and for that reason, people are generally less
likely to take them seriously.
--Adam
--
Adam McKenna <adam@debian.org> <adam@flounder.net>
Reply to: