Re: Bug#88588: libpam-modules: pam-limits.so is broken
John Galt <galt@inconnu.isu.edu> wrote:
>On Mon, 5 Mar 2001, Ben Collins wrote:
>>The reason I posted it to -devel is because I wanted others to see the
>>PAM problem, and know that a bug report was filed, and also to raise
>>awareness of checking for bug reports before filing.
>
>Then wouldn't -user be more appropriate? There are at least three threads
>being propagated about it ATM. BTW, you owe Colin Watson for the fact
>that there aren't even more: he's been doing a pretty good job of
>explaining the situation on -user.
Recognition appreciated, but please don't drag me into your private
flamewars. Ben doesn't owe me anything; he's doing a good job of very
difficult stuff.
--
Colin Watson [cjw44@flatline.org.uk]
Reply to: