RE: Bug#88623: Should not suggest manipulating others' bugs
Agreed... That's what the fixed tag is for... Again, as long as you know
that the bug is fixed, you're probably doing some poor maint with 300 bugs
too many a small favour by tagging it for him.
... Adam Conrad
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Julian Gilbey [mailto:J.D.Gilbey@qmw.ac.uk]
> Sent: Monday, March 05, 2001 3:35 PM
> To: Adam Conrad
> Cc: 'Colin Watson'; debian-devel@lists.debian.org;
> 88623@bugs.debian.org; 'Ben Harris'
> Subject: Re: Bug#88623: Should not suggest manipulating others' bugs
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 05, 2001 at 01:20:58PM -0700, Adam Conrad wrote:
> > In closing: Organizing bugs good. Helps people out.
> Screwing with stuff
> > you don't understand bad. Closing other people's bugs bad.
>
> But marking fixed if they are and the package's BTS section is
> unmaintained and the maintainer is unresponsive is probably OK.
>
> Now that sentence was *far* too long!
>
> Julian
>
> --
> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>
> Julian Gilbey, Dept of Maths, Queen Mary, Univ. of London
> Debian GNU/Linux Developer, see http://people.debian.org/~jdg
> Donate free food to the world's hungry: see
> http://www.thehungersite.com/
Reply to: