Gregor writes: > This situation could be fixed if superceded revisions (such as 2.0-6) > would still be kept and considered for a move into testing. A possible rule: a new version should only displace an old one from unstable if it either has a higher priority or the old one is already in testing. Note: this is only a suggestion. If it isn't useful don't flame me: just say so. -- John Hasler john@dhh.gt.org Dancing Horse Hill Elmwood, Wisconsin