Re: Packages and signatures
- To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Packages and signatures
- From: Nicolás Lichtmaier <nick@debian.org>
- Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2001 23:28:59 -0300
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20010202232859.E1848@debian.org>
- In-reply-to: <20010201122323.C30914@azure.humbug.org.au>; from aj@azure.humbug.org.au on Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 12:23:24PM +1000
- References: <20010127151936.A22490@taral.dhs.org> <20010127171349.M19317@alcor.net> <20010127231152.A830@debian.org> <20010127224509.Q19317@alcor.net> <20010128030306.A3706@debian.org> <20010128155213.X19317@alcor.net> <20010130230915.A8289@debian.org> <84g0i0l8ig.fsf@snoopy.apana.org.au> <20010131201212.B765@debian.org> <20010201122323.C30914@azure.humbug.org.au>
> Before you go starting flamewars about it, you'll probably need to do
> a chunk of work to make sure the autobuilders (and the archive) can
> actually cope with this...
Of course. I'm only talking about what I think is desirable to have at one
point in the future.
Reply to: