Re: design issues in debian packages
>>>>> "Adam" == Adam Heath <doogie@debian.org> writes:
Adam> The way I am solving this for jboss, is to have a .foo to
Adam> match each foo in a .d, where .foo is executable, and this
Adam> .foo is what checks to see if the configuration fragment(as
Adam> I call them) should be used. My goal is to make this script
Adam> generic(so far, it is), and have it be included into
Adam> debianutils. This script also handles the case of .rpm-save
Adam> and .dpkg-new type files, and skips over them.
This of course is another potential solution. While it seems the best
solution I have seen so far, I am not sure I like it :-(.
Would .foo be a conffile? Which file should the user edit?
--
Brian May <bam@debian.org>
Reply to: