Re: ITO: several packages available for adoption
On Tue, 18 Dec 2001, Craig Sanders wrote:
> there was no bug.
Your opinion. And a wrong opinion. Matt gave ample proof that the word
is not valid, but you seemed to ignore it. Selective ignorance, I guess.
> moronic automated spelling flame programs do not create valid bug
> reports, especially when they whine about alleged spelling errors that
> aren't errors.
It wasn't a flame program. That's just your label. It created a perfectly
*valid bug report*. Debbugs processed it, and directed it to your mail
servers.
Reply to: