Re: Unofficial Debian 'testing' FAQ (was Re: Packages in queueforwoody?)
On Thu, 13 Dec 2001, Richard B. Kreckel wrote:
> Hi,
Hi Richard,
>...
> The question that now comes up is what can developers do in order to
> unclog a congestion like this, if it is one. The two depending packages
> in testing are not going to go into testing anyways since the first one
> seems slightly buggy anyways and the second doesn't build any more (since
> libreadline was updated to 4.2a) but there already is a fixed version in
> unstable which by the would work with the cln version that is on hold
> since 32 days. But maybe this is going to be resolved automatically as
> soon as the ten days for these two packages are over???
>...
Oh I see the problem: Updating cln breaks the dependencies of binary
packages of ginac and vice versa, but upgrading both at the same doesn't
break any dependencies. I don't know whether testing is now able to handle
this automatically or whether you still have to ask ajt to handle this
manually.
> Regards
> -richy.
cu
Adrian
--
Get my GPG key: finger bunk@debian.org | gpg --import
Fingerprint: B29C E71E FE19 6755 5C8A 84D4 99FC EA98 4F12 B400
Reply to: