Re: Unofficial Debian 'testing' FAQ (was Re: Packages in queue for woody?)

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Unofficial Debian 'testing' FAQ (was Re: Packages in queue for woody?)
From: Michael Banck <mbanck@gmx.net>
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2001 21:45:19 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20011212204519.GB10619@gmx.net>
Mail-followup-to: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20011212210344.A9130@aurora.fi.muni.cz>
References: <[🔎] 20011211062301.E5688@debian.org> <[🔎] Pine.NEB.4.43.0112121958570.1213-100000@mimas.fachschaften.tu-muenchen.de> <[🔎] 20011212210344.A9130@aurora.fi.muni.cz>

On Wed, Dec 12, 2001 at 09:03:44PM +0100, Marcel Kolaja wrote:
> And wouldn't it be possible to upload security fixes to
> security.debian.org (as in stable)?

Sure, if you volunteer to build them first I guess.

Michael

Reply to:

References:
- Re: Unofficial Debian 'testing' FAQ (was Re: Packages in queue for woody?)
  - From: Anthony Towns <ajt@master.debian.org>
- Re: Unofficial Debian 'testing' FAQ (was Re: Packages in queue for woody?)
  - From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de>
- Re: Unofficial Debian 'testing' FAQ (was Re: Packages in queue for woody?)
  - From: Marcel Kolaja <xkolaja@aurora.fi.muni.cz>

Prev by Date: Re: Unofficial Debian 'testing' FAQ (was Re: Packages in queue forwoody?)
Next by Date: Bug#123678: general: binutils 2.11.92.0.12.3 cannot link kernel
Previous by thread: Re: Unofficial Debian 'testing' FAQ (was Re: Packages in queue for woody?)
Next by thread: Re: Unofficial Debian 'testing' FAQ (was Re: Packages in queue for woody?)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread