[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: apache non-free?

On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 06:05:00PM -0600, Adam Majer wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 05:23:39PM -0600, Adam Heath wrote:
> > On Thu, 6 Dec 2001, Adam Majer wrote:
> > 
> > > Just my two cents but if one cannot modify a package like Apache so it conforms with a distro, then Apache would not be part of any distro :)
> > 
> > You can modify it, you just can't call it apache.
> Then why is Debian or Red Hat or any other ditro calling their modified versions apache? If you couldn't modify it then it could not be in
> Debian? It would need to  be Dapache ;-]

Look again. RedHat calls it "httpd".

Daniel Stone						    <daniel@sfarc.net>
<lazarus> linuxwolf, efnet is, um, not what most competent ppl consider 
"how irc should be"

Attachment: pgpvLy2kWvIls.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: