Re: virtual package (x-)editor ?
On 24-Nov-2001 Tomas Pospisek wrote:
> * Now that the defacto-virtual package "editor" is handled by the
> alternatives mechanism , is there any reason not to include "editor"
> in the virtual packages?
> * I require a program that opens up an editor under X. Right now I am
> which seems rather awkward to me. I would much prefer:
> which would be a link to the following shellsctipt:
> /etc/alternatives/x-terminal-emulator -e /etc/alternatives/editor $*
> in case the user doesn't have any x-editor
sounds like a good idea. emacs, vim, the gtk, the kde, all can provide it.