[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

rproxy (Re: WOW! Re: Rsync on servers)

On Mon, Nov 12, 2001 at 04:52:38PM +1100, Brian May wrote:

> >>>>> "Adam" == Adam Heath <doogie@debian.org> writes:
>     Adam> On 11 Nov 2001, Goswin Brederlow wrote:
>     >> [snip]
>     Adam> Where is this client?  Offloading the cpu usage to the Adam>
>     client is a huge win.  Also, not requiring a special daemon Adam> on
>     the server is another plus.
> Pity it has problems talking to non-rproxy servers though, including
> apache, see bug #83603.
> I use to use rproxy, but I found it wasn't usable because of this
> "bug"(???).
> Does HTTP define a maximum size for a request?

I do not think so.  As the error message indicates, it is a server-imposed

Unless the Apache in question is rsync-capable, it's a waste of bandwidth to
send those headers anyway.

 - mdz

Reply to: