[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: bad upgrade from talkd to ktalkd ... whose bug?

On Wed, Oct 24, 2001 at 09:09:28PM +1000, Sam Couter wrote:
> Christian Kurz <shorty@debian.org> wrote:
> > Yes, the general idea behind this, seems like a good solution. I think
> > the the details for the modules, the language to use and the decision
> > which packages include which part of this, would need to be discussed a
> > bit further.
> I was just throwing the idea in, I hadn't thought it all the way through
> to a spec and design. I'd expect people with more knowledge and experience
> than me to do that bit.
> What's more, I'm not really volunteering to do the work required
> (although I don't think I'd be needed *or* particularly helpful), so I
> can't very well say "This is the way it should be done!".

This has been the problem all along :)  This was discussed in the past,
and people came up with good solutions, but no one ever implemented
them..  Although this is probably the best solution so far.



Attachment: pgpIqiG3v5ef4.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: