Re: G++ 2 => 3 transition (was Re: GNU C++ 3.0 porting help wanted)
On Tue, 16 Oct 2001, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 15, 2001 at 09:58:11PM -0400, Christopher C. Chimelis wrote:
> > Ben Collins and I have already talked about the glibc patches required
> > for actual prelinking to work (they need to make it into upstream CVS
> > prior to hitting our glibc packages), which I agree with, fyi.
> Heh, of course. Ben Collins has never been one to resist piping-hot,
> fresh commits to glibc CVS. ;-)
I'm not much better :-P I just included two patches in the upcoming
binutils package that were only in CVS for an hour or so :-P In all
fairness, they have been tested and fixed a large outstanding problem.