Re: bind9-chroot (was: questions on ITP)
Hamish Moffatt <email@example.com> writes:
> On Mon, Oct 01, 2001 at 11:14:54AM +0200, Christian Kurz wrote:
> > On 01/10/01, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> > > On Sun, Sep 30, 2001 at 07:34:29PM +0200, Christian Kurz wrote:
> > > > No, because we already have now for quite some time a bind package in
> > > > debian without an automatic chroot. So we should either offer a chroot
> > > > for both kernel versions 2.4.x and 2.2.x or still stay with the old
> > > > packages offering no automatic chroot.
> > > Why?
> > Aren't you reading my mails completely? You already asked that kind of
> > question before and I answered it. Instead you removed that part here,
> > didn't comment it and instead try to make me look like a stupid boy.
> > Thanks. :-(
> Sorry you think so. I genuinely did not see your explanation as to why
> a partial solution (2.4.x only) would not be better than the current
> solution. In fact, I genuinely cannot believe that there is such
> an explanation.
Not all Debian distributions will run Linux as a kernel.
Mr Anders Jackson