[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: more debian



On Sat, Sep 29, 2001 at 04:29:43PM -0000, The RainmakeR wrote:
> Hi,
>    I am a linux user. I was excited to know that there's a multimedia version of Debian out there. I am not a linux geek and I don't know any programming languages. But I came up with this idea that Debian should have more branches, concerntrating on certain aspects of the operation system (eg. multimedia, security, gaming, server and desktop). In this way, I believe that linux will progress much faster and better. And it would probably be the only way to counter other giant-computer companies like Microsoft and its latest Windows XP. I realised that manpower requirement for such efforts would be great. There are tons of different linux distributers out there, ranging from small ones to large well-known ones. I believe that they would join you in such a task if they realise the potential. Of course one day when these branches have perfect their aspects, all can be intergrated into a single unparalleled linux distribution. Soon I will learn to program, and soon I will probably join Debian. Cheers~! =)


If you are looking for a Debian-based GNU/Linux multimedia distribution, you
can have a look at the Demudi (DEbian MUltimedia DIstribution) project (www.demudi.org)

> 
> rainmaker
> 
> 
> ________________________________________________________________
> Get Free Anime Email, News, Links, Forums and Shopping at http://www.AnimeNation.com
> 
> 
> -- 
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Eric VAN BUGGENHAUT     "Oh My God! They killed init! You Bastards!"
			--from a /. post
        \_|_/           Andago
       \/   \/          Av. Santa Engracia, 54
a n d a g o  |--        E-28010 Madrid - tfno:+34(91)2041100
       /\___/\ 		http://www.andago.com
        / | \           "Innovando en Internet"
                        eric@andago.com



Reply to: