Re: AMD related

[Sean Middleditch <elanthis@awesomeplay.com>]

Huh, interesting.  What is the difference then between 586 and 686 to
justify the change, but not for later processors?

On Sun, 2001-09-30 at 12:45, Scott Dier wrote:
> Linux gurney 2.4.9 #3 Tue Aug 21 13:07:28 CDT 2001 i686 unknown
> 
> processor       : 0
> vendor_id       : GenuineIntel
> cpu family      : 15
> model           : 0
> model name      : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 1800MHz
> stepping        : 10
> cpu MHz         : 1794.599
> cache size      : 256 KB
> fdiv_bug        : no
> hlt_bug         : no
> f00f_bug        : no
> coma_bug        : no
> fpu             : yes
> fpu_exception   : yes
> cpuid level     : 2
> wp              : yes
> flags           : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 sep mtrr pge mca
> cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss tm
> bogomips        : 3578.26
> 
> 
> * Sean Middleditch <elanthis@awesomeplay.com> [010930 11:43]:
> > Should be, ya.  586 is pentium, 686 is step up (pentium II, later
> > AMD's).  I've always wondering if a Pentium III/Athlon is a 786 or not,
> > though... and what about P IV's?
> > 
> > Sean Etc.
> > 
> > On Sun, 2001-09-30 at 12:26, (null) wrote:
> > > 
> > > 
> > >  Hello all
> > > 
> > > 
> > >   I have a AMD  Duron processor and when i do "uname  -m " i get related
> > >   to i686 is it correct ?
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > -- 
> > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
> > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
>