[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: PROPOSED: slight change to wnpp procedures



On Wed, Sep 26, 2001 at 02:57:50AM +0100, James Troup wrote:
> Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org> writes:
> 
> > Apparently the package is never to be accepted into Debian,
> 
> Err, no, I never said that.

Exhibit 1:
<http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=113360&msg=11&repeatmerged=yes>

  From: James Troup <james@nocrew.org>
  Date: 25 Sep 2001 19:18:42 +0100
  In-Reply-To: <handler.s.C.10014406864339.transcript@bugs.debian.org>
  Message-ID: <87ite7p20t.fsf@tacitus.systems>
  Lines: 8
  User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7
  MIME-Version: 1.0
  Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
  Sender: James Troup <james@ruari-quinn.demon.co.uk>
  Delivered-To: control@bugs.debian.org

  tags 113360 wontfix
  severity 113360 wishlist
  thanks

  Bored now.

Exhibit 2:
<http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#severities>

  wontfix

  This bug won't be fixed. Possibly because this is a choice between two
  arbitrary ways of doing things and the maintainer and submitter prefer
  different ways of doing things, possibly because changing the behaviour
  will cause other, worse, problems for others, or possibly for other
  reasons.

Did you tag the bug "wontfix" in error?

-- 
G. Branden Robinson                |      "I came, I saw, she conquered."
Debian GNU/Linux                   |      The original Latin seems to have
branden@debian.org                 |      been garbled.
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |      -- Robert Heinlein

Attachment: pgpIxlYCCBdjf.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: