Re: new port
Previously Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> That's why I suggest using symlinks. There are three places in the archive
> where an architecture's name is mentioned:
It's still a lot of work for very little gain. At some point we
will probably need to forget about the binary-<arch> idea anyway.
It does not scale if you get a lot of <arch>-<os> combinations
and packages which work on various subsets of the possible permutations
of those.
Wichert.
--
_________________________________________________________________
/ Nothing is fool-proof to a sufficiently talented fool \
| wichert@wiggy.net http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ |
| 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0 2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |
Reply to: