[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Proposal: new alternatives links



On Sat, Aug 18, 2001 at 12:18:20AM +0200, Christian Marillat wrote:
> >>>> "AB" == Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de> writes:
> > Since my MUA doesn't respect Mail-Copies-To:, too, could you please point
> > me to the RFC where this header is defined so that I can blame the people
> > who wrote my MUA?
> 
> Mail-Copies-To isn't yet in RFC like signature separator "-- ". See :
> 
> http://cr.yp.to/proto/replyto.html

I think he was trying to tell me that since it isn't in an RFC (yet), I
should fuck off with my requests to not be spammed.

Because, of course, if it's not in an RFC, it must be Wrong and Evil.

-- 
G. Branden Robinson                |      Never underestimate the power of
Debian GNU/Linux                   |      human stupidity.
branden@debian.org                 |      -- Robert Heinlein
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |

Attachment: pgppYRJRcda0J.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: