On Thu, Aug 16, 2001 at 04:07:14PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Aug 2001, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > Of course, it looks like either (a) Linux's fs caches have much better
> > complexity, as long as you've got the RAM to use them, or (b) the
> > huge jump in master's specs (thanks HP! :) has made the performance
> > problems pretty trivial. Either way, the indices are only taking about
> > 14s to generate from scratch atm, so we'll be making them happen a lot
> > more often. For reference, they're now at every 30mins, down from every
> > four hours.
> How long did it take on the old master?
IIRC, around 5mins of CPU time, maybe 20mins of real time. I don't really
remember though.
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
``_Any_ increase in interface difficulty, in exchange for a benefit you
do not understand, cannot perceive, or don't care about, is too much.''
-- John S. Novak, III (The Humblest Man on the Net)
Attachment:
pgpgMHZVxsUEv.pgp
Description: PGP signature