On Wed, Aug 08, 2001 at 02:18:10AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > > [fx: looks in group.master] > > Oh. Possibly because the man group doesn't exist statically after all. > Should it be created and have the man user put in it? Or maybe I should > just not rock the boat too much while it's afloat. oh ok, i thought there was no man group.. i don't see much point of adding man to the man group, if it was static then making the man user's primary group man would make sense. -- Ethan Benson http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/
Attachment:
pgpfZdFGgRbrB.pgp
Description: PGP signature