Re: changelogs again (libc6 this time)
On Tue, Jul 31, 2001 at 03:07:40PM +0200, Miros/law Baran wrote:
> > And...? I still don't see the explanation. "Three symbols were
> > added/renamed in libX11" or something like that would suffice.
>
> Did the upstream changelogs evaporate mysteriously?
So the maintainer is supposed to write an extremely long changelog yet not
mention why he bumped the version in shlibs and thus affected more than a
thousand packages, and instead leave it to the others to read hundreds or
thousands of lines of upstream changelog and figure it out? Bah.
--
Digital Electronic Being Intended for Assassination and Nullification
Reply to: