Re: Bug#106678: ITP: new -- A template system
On 26-Jul-01, 19:50 (CDT), David Schleef <email@example.com> wrote:
> I would strongly suggest a different package name than 'new', since
> it is too generic and misleading. The command name is, as well,
> but I think that is less of an issue.
I dunno. It's actually fairly natural to type 'new file.c'. The package
name doesn't conflict with anything else, and we seem to operate on a
first-come, first-serve basis. It matches the upstream name, which is
If you want to talk about misleading and generic, let's talk about
imagemagick's 'identify' and 'convert' commands :-).
Steve Greenland <firstname.lastname@example.org>
(Please do not CC me on mail sent to this list; I subscribe to and read
every list I post to.)