Re: conffiles problem
From: Russell Coker <russell@coker.com.au>
Subject: conffiles problem
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2001 10:21:19 +0200
> Here is debian/conffiles from my devfsd package:
> /etc/devfs/devfsd.conf
> /etc/devfs/symlinks
> /etc/init.d/devfsd
> /etc/devfs/perms
> /etc/devfs/devices
> /etc/devfs/devices.d/devfsd
> /etc/devfs/symlinks.d/devfsd
> /etc/modutils/devfsd
>
> Here is what ends up in a freshly created package (I extracted it with ar -x
> and looked inside control.tgz):
> /etc/devfs/devfsd.conf
> /etc/devfs/symlinks
> /etc/init.d/devfsd
> /etc/devfs/perms
> /etc/devfs/devices
> /etc/devfs/devices.d/devfsd
> /etc/devfs/symlinks.d/devfsd
> /etc/modutils/devfsd
> /etc/devfs/devices.d/devfsd
> /etc/devfs/devices
> /etc/devfs/perms
> /etc/devfs/symlinks.d/devfsd
> /etc/devfs/symlinks
> /etc/devfs/devfsd.conf
> /etc/modutils/devfsd
> /etc/init.d/devfsd
>
> It was built with dpkg version 1.9.16.
I was taught by a Japanese developer that man debhelper said
V3 This is the reccommended mode of operation. Setting
DH_COMPAT=3 does everything V2 does, plus:
- Debhelper config files support globbing via *
and ?, when appropriate. To turn this off and
use those characters raw, just prefix with a
backslash.
- dh_makeshlibs makes the postinst and postrm
scripts call ldconfig.
- Every file in etc/ is automatically flagged as
a conffile by dh_installdeb.
I don't know if it can be supressed with some options.
I hope this is what you asked.
Best Regards, 2001.7.25
--
Debian Developer & Debian JP Developer - much more I18N of Debian
Atsuhito Kohda <kohda@debian.org>
Department of Math., Tokushima Univ.
Reply to: