Re: real LSB compliance
On Sun, Jul 01, 2001 at 03:15:32PM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote:
>On Sun, Jul 01, 2001 at 02:07:38PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
>> * LSB defines runlevels, while we define 2-5 identically by default.
>> 2 multiuser with no network services exported
>> 3 normal/full multiuser
>> 4 reserved for local use, default is normal/full multiuser
>> 5 multiuser with xdm or equivalent
>more `lets make whatever redhat does standard!' runlevels are sysadmin
>policy, not some retarded `standards' group. ignore this.
Why immediately presume that this is a RedHat-ism? We are talking about
sysvinit after all and System V has used differentiated run-levels for
as long as I can recall.
Those specific semantics are pretty much what I recall from SVR2
although X wasn't an issue and run-level 5 was "firmware".
I'd quite like to see this implemented, although it would be quite
tricky to implement from an upgrade perspective.
Brendan O'Dea firstname.lastname@example.org
Compusol Pty. Limited (NSW, Australia) +61 2 9810 3633