Re: Another changelog rant
Previously Peter S Galbraith wrote:
> Oh, so you were just trolling. Too bad. I thought you were on
> to something.
I was not trolling, I just pointed out that there is a simple way
to distinguish between the files that emacs could also use. The
fact that vim does that already only shows that it can indeed be
done.
Wichert.
--
_________________________________________________________________
/ Nothing is fool-proof to a sufficiently talented fool \
| wichert@wiggy.net http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ |
| 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0 2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |
Reply to: