Re: sponsor rules
On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 04:25:11PM -0400, Susan G. Kleinmann wrote:
> Apparently, the package was sponsored by some debian developer who didn't
> have much time to make _any_ checks on it before sponsoring it.
Dreadful. Those things put a bad light on the sponsorship.
> This leads me to the question, what are the rules for sponsorship?
> I couldn't find the word 'sponsor' in any of the files in either of:
> --developers-reference (version 2.8.7),
I'll write something in developers-reference (CVS).
> no consequences for sponsoring blatantly buggy packages,
What consequences would you propose? (asking honestly)
--
Digital Electronic Being Intended for Assassination and Nullification
Reply to: