Re: LSB Spec 1.0 Criticism
On Wed, 4 Jul 2001, Theodore Tso wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 04, 2001 at 03:35:17PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > First, it'd be nice if there were a text version of the spec. HTML split
> > into multiple pages, RTF and PDF are all pretty awkward. The HTML stuff
> > could really use a "Next section" link, at least.
> Agreed. If anyone knows how to configure the !@#!@# SGML software to
> emit a single HTML file, that would both be useful for folks who want
> to be able to quicky thumb through the entire standard in a web
> broswer, as well as making it easy to generate a TXT version of the
> spec by simply using lynx.
If you like, I will volunteer to do this.
Jaldhar H. Vyas <firstname.lastname@example.org>