RE: make-kpkg

["Sean 'Shaleh' Perry" <shalehperry@home.com>]

> 
> (3) i use a mixture of stable/unstable/testing. i figure that i have
> to compile everything on the lowest common denominator, so i use a
> stable machine. but i think that it is bad (performance, security) for
> me to run a kernel compiled on stable on a system that runs testing or
> unstable. is there a good way to use one system to compile for all
> three releases?
> 

the kernel can be compiled anywhere it has no link to what it was built on. 
The only possible problem would be dpkg version issues, which should not happen
too often.