On Sun, Jun 24, 2001 at 06:12:36AM +0200, Joost Kooij wrote: > We are the cult of the true $PATH. We give ritual meaning to our cultural > identity by burning the holy trace-roots in the sacred s-bin. Meanwhile, > we endlessly chant the songs of the ancestors, who have always known > where the trace-root must be dug up. > LOL, good one :) I just don't see why traceroute cannot simply be put in /usr/bin and a symlink (or other such measures like a wrapper) placed in /usr/sbin. Would this not make both partys happy? We would then be FHS compliant and using the symlinks is permitted. Why should we have it in /sbin just because a lot of other UNIX OS' have theirs in the wrong place. I find it repulsive to think that we would even consider making a release that 'claims' to support the FHS but so blatantly does not. Lets get it sorted and get FHS compliant instead of talking about it! Thanks Peter
Attachment:
pgpiQLQIrnhJk.pgp
Description: PGP signature