Re: traceroute in /usr/bin, not /usr/sbin
Herbert Xu writes:
> Richard Kettlewell <rjk@greenend.org.uk> wrote:
>> However, I thought the argument was "get traceroute in the right
>> place", not "get traceroute in the right place and definitely don't
>> change anything else at all".
>
> Well, I've repeatedly pointed out that this rule entails moving
> things like sendmail. Is this something that you would agree with?
> If so, then I rest my case. If not, then this rule is simply broken
> and it makes no sense to move even one binary for it.
Yes, the same reading of the FHS implies that sendmail etc should be
available via /usr/bin (or /bin where appropriate) as well.
(The requirement for a link is stronger in the Sendmail case, of
course.)
ttfn/rjk
Reply to: