Re: looking for the autogen's maintainer called James R. Van Zandt <jrv@vanzandt.mv.com>
On Thu, 21 Jun 2001 at 17:07:14 +0200, Tamas SZERB wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Jun 2001, Colin Watson wrote:
> > There appear to be three open non-forwarded bugs, none very old. Your
> > grave (not important) bug was submitted *yesterday*, which is not a lot
> > of notice, and doesn't fit the definition of grave [1] anyway. Did you
> > read bug #99470, where the maintainer had a conversation with a bug
> > submitter and upstream about problems with autogen 5 (your bug, in fact,
> > so I assume you didn't) less than a week ago?
>
> So don't you think it is not important that a package wich is installed
> you can't compile the newer one?
Of course I do. It's precisely that, important, or maybe serious. Bug
severity inflation just makes life difficult for QA, though.
Anyhow, the maintainer knows about it and seems to be working on it, so
it's academic.
--
Colin Watson [cjwatson@flatline.org.uk]
Reply to: