Re: Locking of serial devices and devfs
Previously Cyrille Chepelov wrote:
> Hmmm... then, we have hardlinks and inodes. Can't we index by inode, then ?
If you have to invent an inode number for devices it will mostly like
be something like f(major,minor) so you might as well use those directly..
Wichert.
--
_________________________________________________________________
/ Nothing is fool-proof to a sufficiently talented fool \
| wichert@wiggy.net http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ |
| 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0 2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |
Reply to: