Re: ITP: squeak-vm, squeak-image, squeak-sources -- A highly portable Smaltalk system
On Fri, Jun 01, 2001 at 02:56:13PM -0500, Vince Mulhollon wrote:
> On 06/01/2001 01:57:54 PM wouter wrote:
> >> On Fri, 1 Jun 2001, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
> >> > > > Btw, this license is unacceptable for at least one point: "here
> >> > > > Licensee is located in the province of Quebec, Canada, the
> >> > > > clause applies: The parties hereto confirm that they have
> >> > > > that this Agreement and all related documents be drafted in
> >> > > > Les parties ont exig? que le pr?sent contrat et tous les
> >> > > > documents connexes soient redig?s en anglais."
> >> > > >
> >> > > > In Qu?bec, there happens to be a law which permit Quebecers to
> >> > > > require an official document to be in French.
> Merely Official Govt Documents and Laws, or literally any private contract
> between individuals?
> I would be surprised if the Canadian's regulated the language of private
You don't need an apostrophe here.
> communications between private individuals.
However, it is the province of Quebec, only, that regulates language.
Believe it or not, if you have a bilingual sign, the French lettering
much be physically larger than that of the other language. (Comment
est-ce qu'on dit "petty" en francais?)
[ ... ]
> I am not a lawyer, [ ... but I'm every bit as verbose ... ]
by Rocket to the Moon,
by Airplane to the Rocket,
by Taxi to the Airport,
by Frontdoor to the Taxi,
by throwing back the blanket and laying down the legs ...
- They Might Be Giants