On Wed, May 30, 2001 at 11:13:39AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > In my opinion those databases should have allways the same priority > to get listed together. What do you think which priority might be > apropriate. Quoting from policy section 2.2: Important programs, including those which one would expect to find on any Unix-like system. If the expectation is that an experienced Unix person who found it missing would say `What on earth is going on, where is foo?', it must be an important package. By this definition, surely fortunes are Important? :) -- Andrew Suffield <asuffield@users.sourceforge.net> Dept. of Computing, Imperial College, London, UK
Attachment:
pgpws5GinIt5W.pgp
Description: PGP signature