Re: Automake 2.50 migration strategy, as implemented
On Sun, May 27, 2001 at 12:07:46PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Since I do currently because of the lack of a running autobuilder
> recompile some packages by hand for i386 I'd be very interested to hear
> which special treatments besides the handling of packages without build
> dependencies I should be aware of.
(a) There is a running autobuilder for i386.
(b) If the package builds by installing build-essential and satisfying
its explicitly listed build-depends, there's not a problem. If it
doesn't, the autobuilders have some special case code to make it build
in some situations.
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
``_Any_ increase in interface difficulty, in exchange for a benefit you
do not understand, cannot perceive, or don't care about, is too much.''
-- John S. Novak, III (The Humblest Man on the Net)
Reply to: