Re: LILO

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: LILO
From: Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org>
Date: 10 May 2001 09:49:18 -0500
Message-id: <[🔎] 871ypxs1ht.fsf@glaurung.green-gryphon.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 0105101434173G.10862@lyta> (Russell Coker's message of "Thu, 10 May 2001 14:34:17 +0200")
References: <[🔎] 0105101329213F.10862@lyta> <[🔎] 20010510134711.G26896@lin-gen.com> <[🔎] 0105101434173G.10862@lyta>

>>"Russell" == Russell Coker <russell@coker.com.au> writes:

 Russell> Kernel images produced by kernel-package depend on lilo. 
	
        Say what? Since when has that happened? I see a suggestion on
 an *APPROPRIATE* arch dependent boot loader (silo, milo, etc), but
 never has there been a dependency. 

	manoj
-- 
 I wouldn't ever write the full sentence myself, but then, I never use
 goto either. Larry Wall in <199709032332.QAA21669@wall.org>
Manoj Srivastava   <srivasta@debian.org>  <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05  CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B  924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: LILO
  - From: Russell Coker <russell@coker.com.au>

References:
- LILO
  - From: Russell Coker <russell@coker.com.au>
- Re: LILO
  - From: Robert van der Meulen <rvdm@cistron.nl>
- Re: LILO
  - From: Russell Coker <russell@coker.com.au>

Prev by Date: Re: weird LDAP situation
Next by Date: Re: LILO
Previous by thread: Re: LILO
Next by thread: Re: LILO
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread