On Wed, May 09, 2001 at 01:08:21PM -0400, Albert den Haan wrote:
> The LSB's LCD ("Lowest Common Denominator") is working on a simple package
> system that is the *intersection* of capabilities the major ones in current
> use. Yes the RPM V3 [1] package archive file format is being used (as
> *.lsb files), but to handle data dpkg both requires and will not choke on.
[snip]
>
> [1] Note that this archive file format is understood by both the rpm V3 and
> V4 programs.
may i suggest you use a more generic format? .debs are nothing more
then an ar archive containing a couple gzipped tarballs. they can
extracted on virtually any system, regardless of OS even. this is a
tremendous advantage IMO, both because for example slackware need not
put rpm into thier distro, and more importantly for recovery
purposes. it can be a life saver to be able to quickly extract a
package on a badly hosed system. (lets say a bout of filesystem
corruption wipes out /bin/rpm) and yes i have had this type of thing
happen before. debian's human readable and editable package database,
and open and standard ar+tar+gzip package format saved me from a
reinstall.
this choice of using the rpm binary format should be reconsidered
IMNSHO. i don't really care whether you use the debian ar+tar+gzip,
or just plain .tar.gz, just use something i can extract *anywhere*
with the most basic and standard tools, without having to go and
compile rpm or some rpm archive extracter.
--
Ethan Benson
http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/
Attachment:
pgpRly6nxBIWj.pgp
Description: PGP signature