searching for Bill Geddes [Mailer-Daemon@master.debian.org: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender]
Hi,
Looks like another one of those Maintainer fields broken by hp/agilent split
or whatever it was...
----- Forwarded message from Mail Delivery System <Mailer-Daemon@master.debian.org> -----
Delivery-date: Sun, 29 Apr 2001 20:05:26 +0200
X-Failed-Recipients: geddes@col.hp.com
From: Mail Delivery System <Mailer-Daemon@master.debian.org>
To: owner@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender
Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2001 13:03:47 -0500
This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.
A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
recipients. The following address(es) failed:
geddes@col.hp.com:
unrouteable mail domain "col.hp.com"
------ This is a copy of the message, including all the headers. ------
Return-path: <owner@bugs.debian.org>
Received: from gecko by master.debian.org with local (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 14tvXr-00025m-00; Sun, 29 Apr 2001 13:03:43 -0500
Subject: Bug#32517: vrms doesn't report any non-free packages
Reply-To: pmaydell@chiark.greenend.org.uk, 32517@bugs.debian.org
Resent-From: pmaydell@chiark.greenend.org.uk
Orignal-Sender: pm215@watchdragon.demon.co.uk
Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org
Resent-CC: Bill Geddes <geddes@debian.org>
Resent-Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2001 18:03:42 GMT
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.32517.B32517.9885642932555@bugs.debian.org>
Resent-Sender: owner@bugs.debian.org
X-Debian-PR-Message: report 32517
X-Debian-PR-Package: vrms
X-Debian-PR-Keywords:
X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org
Received: via spool by 32517-bugs@bugs.debian.org id=B32517.9885642932555
(code B ref 32517); Sun, 29 Apr 2001 18:03:42 GMT
To: 32517@bugs.debian.org
From: pmaydell@chiark.greenend.org.uk
Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2001 18:10:31 +0100
Sender: pm215@watchdragon.demon.co.uk
Message-Id: <E14tuib-0002ey-00@watchdragon.demon.co.uk>
Delivered-To: 32517@bugs.debian.org
I think this bug is actually a result of the dpkg bugs 54529, 58106, 59440,
60973, 63101 (merged), and it should probably be merged with those or
closed. [Basically, dpkg isn't correctly updating the Section header, so
obviously vrms hasn't got a chance of doing the Right Thing.]
It's also the same as the vrms merged-bug cluster
53155, 57693, 57766, 78633, 84280.
I think you should merge 32517 with those, and then reassign the
whole lot to dpkg and merge them together with the dpkg bugs.
Peter Maydell
----- End forwarded message -----
--
Digital Electronic Being Intended for Assassination and Nullification
Reply to: