Re: Are build-dependancies mandatory?
On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 03:25:54PM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> > I still don't understand why the policy (version 220.127.116.11)
> > doesn't simply say "must" rather then "may".
> Debian is a community which exists for the mutual benefit of its members.
> Members playing games like 'policy does not say I *HAVE* to do it' do not make
> Debian a better place.
Don't get me wrong, I was just trying to learn what's the
status of build depends. Now it seems it's a standard, while
the policy gives the impression it's some kind of a draft...
PS: PLEASE respect my mail-followup-to. I do read mail from
lists I'm subscribed to.
Marcin Owsiany <firstname.lastname@example.org>
GnuPG: 1024D/60F41216 FE67 DA2D 0ACA FC5E 3F75 D6F6 3A0D 8AA0 60F4 1216