Re: Bug#93388: ITP: tramp
On Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 07:38:35PM +0800, zhaoway wrote:
> epg@pobox.com (Eric Gillespie, Jr.) writes:
>
> > Package: wnpp
> > Severity: wishlist
> >
> > From the manual:
> >
> > TRAMP stands for `Transparent Remote (file) Access, Multiple
> > Protocol'. This package provides remote file editing, similar to
> > ange-ftp and EFS.
> >
> > The difference is that ange-ftp uses FTP to transfer files
> > between the local and the remote host, whereas TRAMP uses a
> > combination of rsh and rcp or other work-alike programs, such as
> > ssh/scp.
> >
> > Tramp is released under the GNU GPL.
>
> zw@q:~/ > dpkg -s tramp
> Package: tramp
> Status: install ok installed
> Priority: optional
> Section: editors
> Installed-Size: 504
> Maintainer: Ola Lundqvist <opal@debian.org>
> Version: 20010227-3
> Depends: emacs20 | xemacs21 | emacsen
> Recommends: sharutils | metamail
> Suggests: ssh, telnet, rsh-client, rsync, sudo, mimencode
> Description: Remote file access in emacs.
> TRAMP stands for `Transparent Remote (file) Access, Multiple Protocol'. This
> package provides remote file editing, similar to ange-ftp and EFS.
> .
> The difference is that ange-ftp uses FTP to transfer files between the local
> and the remote host, whereas TRAMP uses a combination of rsh and rcp or other
> work-alike programs, such as ssh/scp. A emacs elisp tool to edit files on
> remote host using telnet, rsh, scp, ssh and more.
> .
> It does not (yet) work with xemacs21-gtk.
>
> zw@q:~/ >
>
> Though I still cannot make it work/popup here instead of efs.
What version of emacs do you have?
It works with plain emacs but there are some compilation errors with
xemacs.
Regards,
// Ola
--
--------------------- Ola Lundqvist ---------------------------
/ opal@debian.org Björnkärrsgatan 5 A.11 \
| opal@lysator.liu.se 584 36 LINKÖPING |
| +46 (0)13-17 69 83 +46 (0)70-332 1551 |
| http://www.opal.dhs.org UIN/icq: 4912500 |
\ gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36 4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 /
---------------------------------------------------------------
Reply to: