Re: Generic maintainer email address
Michael Bramer <grisu@debian.org> writes:
> On Sat, Apr 07, 2001 at 02:20:14PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
> > Stefan Hornburg (Racke) wrote:
> > > Martin Schulze <joey@finlandia.infodrom.north.de> writes:
> > > > Stefan Hornburg wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > I wonder if there is a generic email address for an Debian package,
> > > > > sth. like that courier@packages.debian.org, so one get hand out
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > > > > an address to upstream that's get not change in case of a
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > > > > new maintainer.
> ####^^^^^^^^^^
> > > > Umh... *cough* It's there for some four years now...
>
> :-). I pointed out this to racke on the cebit meeting
>
> > > Umh... *cough* It seems not to be prominently documented
> > > where a Debian greenhorn would poke its nose on
> > > (excuse me if I'm wrong).
> > >
> > > I suggest to add to the debian developer's reference,
> > > 3.4. Coordination With Upstream Developers.
> >
> > Umh, now it gets nasty, I and somebody else, were in simple-parse-mode,
> > and at least I responded wrong to read keywords... That's the address
> > to reach the Debian maintainer, not the upstream maintainer.
>
> read the above (underline) text. The package@p.d.o is the right thing
> and he need this _for_ the upstream.
Yes, this was exactly my point.
Ciao
Racke
--
Alter ego of LinuXia Systems (URL: http://www.linuxia.de),
Debian maintainer (e.g. Courier Mail Server suite), Interchange developer;
For projects and other business stuff please refer to COBOLT NetServices
(URL: http://www.cobolt.net; Email: info@cobolt.net; Phone: 0041-1-3884400)
Reply to: