On Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 05:51:24PM +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote: > Well bind is hard to replace. Someone was digging up a chrooted > one though. http://cr.yp.to/djbdns.html there. BIND is dead. long live tinydns! -john i run BIND on exactly ZERO of my machines, and most of them either run a cacheing nameserver (or access one) and others run full blown dns servers. none run (or directly access) BIND. of course, none of my systems run sendmail or wu-ftpd either.