Re: RFC: new update-inetd
On Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 02:38:58PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 03:25:18PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > Package: netkit-inetd
> > Priority: optional
> Just a small note: since stuff like telnetd has the standard priority, one
> of the internet-superserver-providing packages needs to have the same
> priority, or the priority of telnetd (and possibly other packages) needs to
> be lowered.
Err, indeed. netkit-inetd'll stay as standard then I guess. Actually,
it'll be important (along with the dummy netbase package) until exim
and such like change to whatever the new scheme ends up being.
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
``_Any_ increase in interface difficulty, in exchange for a benefit you
do not understand, cannot perceive, or don't care about, is too much.''
-- John S. Novak, III (The Humblest Man on the Net)
Reply to: