Re: Packages still using /usr/doc in unstable

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Packages still using /usr/doc in unstable
From: John Hasler <john@dhh.gt.org>
Date: 27 Mar 2001 14:34:17 -0600
Message-id: <[🔎] 87bsqnoss6.fsf@toncho.dhh.gt.org>
In-reply-to: Adam Heath's message of "Tue, 27 Mar 2001 13:14:09 -0600 (CST)"
References: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.33.0103271313580.26984-100000@localhost>

I wrote:
> The BTS is not reliable.  Please send seperate emails.

Adam Heath writes:
> why do you say this?

Experience.
-- 
John Hasler
john@dhh.gt.org
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, Wisconsin

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Packages still using /usr/doc in unstable
  - From: Adam Heath <doogie@debian.org>
- Re: Packages still using /usr/doc in unstable
  - From: Dale Scheetz <dwarf@polaris.net>

References:
- Re: Packages still using /usr/doc in unstable
  - From: Adam Heath <doogie@debian.org>

Prev by Date: ITP: libglade-ruby -- Ruby interface to libglade
Next by Date: Re: Bug#90867: Menu is more important than it would seem
Previous by thread: Re: Packages still using /usr/doc in unstable
Next by thread: Re: Packages still using /usr/doc in unstable
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread