Re: Is this a bug with glibc (ntohl, ntohs, ...)?

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Is this a bug with glibc (ntohl, ntohs, ...)?
From: Richard Braakman <dark@xs4all.nl>
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2001 16:46:17 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20010327164617.A20998@xs4all.nl>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20010327163914.A27096@cistron.nl>; from joostje@cistron.nl on Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 04:39:14PM +0200
References: <[🔎] 3AB510BD.B425EEE2@cs.bilkent.edu.tr> <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.30.0103181402350.29460-100000@tennyson.netexpress.net> <[🔎] 20010327163914.A27096@cistron.nl>

On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 04:39:14PM +0200, Joost Witteveen wrote:
> $ dpkg -S /usr/include/linux/cdrom.h 
> libc6-dev: /usr/include/linux/cdrom.h

That's because our libc6-dev package contains the kernel headers that
glibc was compiled with.  They didn't come from glibc.

Richard Braakman

Reply to:

References:
- Is this a bug with glibc (ntohl, ntohs, ...)?
  - From: Eray Ozkural <erayo@cs.bilkent.edu.tr>
- Re: Is this a bug with glibc (ntohl, ntohs, ...)?
  - From: Steve Langasek <vorlon@netexpress.net>
- Re: Is this a bug with glibc (ntohl, ntohs, ...)?
  - From: Joost Witteveen <joostje@cistron.nl>

Prev by Date: Re: Is this a bug with glibc (ntohl, ntohs, ...)?
Next by Date: Re: Is this a bug with glibc (ntohl, ntohs, ...)?
Previous by thread: Re: Is this a bug with glibc (ntohl, ntohs, ...)?
Next by thread: Re: Is this a bug with glibc (ntohl, ntohs, ...)?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread