Re: libc 6 snarl

[cjw44@flatline.org.uk (Colin Watson)]

Heitzso <xxh1@cdc.gov> wrote:
>I've been bitten (Mon AM, tried half a dozen mirrors and main ftp debian
>site).
>
>I saw an email in the archives (I'm not actively on the list) re a form
>of the libc 6 upgrade bug from last week.  I apologize if this has been
>fully dealt with in more recent emails that are not in the archive
>
>Current form breaks:
>  libc6 depends on newer version of libdb2 than is available
>      2:2.7.7-4 versus 2:2.7.7-3
>  libc6-dev depends on older version of libc6
>etc.  Don't know how deep the snarl goes but it's nasty.

It's a different problem from last week's. libdb2 is stuck in incoming;
you could grab it from there if you're desperate.

-- 
Colin Watson                                     [cjw44@flatline.org.uk]