Re: Officially drop Linux 2.0 support? (was Some /usr/doc NMUs coming up)
Wichert Akkerman <wichert@valinux.com> writes:
> I seriously object to this. There are very good reasons for using
> 2.2, and I certainly wouldn't put 2.4 on any critical server unless
> I really needed its features. The 2.2 kernel series has received
> *lots* more testing then 2.4 has, and people still discover nasty
> problems including all kinds of disk corruption in 2.4.
I recall talking with Andrea Arcangeli at the Pluto Meeting last fall,
and he certainly wasn't convinced of 2.4's stability at that point...
--
David N. Welton
Free Software: http://people.debian.org/~davidw/
Apache Tcl: http://tcl.apache.org/
Personal: http://www.efn.org/~davidw/
Work: http://www.innominate.com/
Reply to: